Upload a tax authority letter (for example CRA correspondence) and receive a structured reading of the procedural stage of the case.

The system analyzes institutional signals in the document and identifies the likely stage of the tax process.

Fiscal Geometry

A conceptual framework for mapping institutional tension through event-based fiscal structures 

What this framework does

Fiscal Geometry makes institutional stress visible before judgment, reform, or optimization.

It maps rules, capital flows, and outcomes into a shared coordinate space—so misalignment can be seen, not argued. 

A data-driven, non-normative model

Fiscal Geometry is strictly data-driven.It does not evaluate, recommend, or judge.

It renders institutional structure visible, allowing distortion to be observed as geometry rather than argued as interpretation. 

Admissibility and Computation

Only the dominant cloud—where interaction records concentrate most densely—is eligible for computation.

When stable, it is compared with Arithmetic ITI to derive IDI.

Other geometric structures remain visible for interpretation but do not enter calculation. 

Use of Framework Notice

Fiscal Geometry is an original analytical framework developed by Jim Y. Huang.

Academic discussion, citation, and non-operational reference remain unrestricted.

The framework is strictly non-normative and does not provide recommendations, decisions, or professional advice.

Operational deployment of the framework — including internal analysis, compliance design, AI system structuring, governance workflows, or institutional decision systems — falls within licensed use of the framework.