Positioning Statement
Framework (IRF) is a protocol-level method for encoding and comparing cross-domain legal event-flows without semantic unification.
Legal domains are treated as interface processors acting on a shared event-flow.
Instead of asking what an event “is” in each domain, IRF records how the same event-flow is transformed across interfaces.
Core Idea
A single anchor role—an owner–manager acting as both shareholder and managerial decision-maker—is used as a tracing unit.
This unit carries one continuous event-flow across tax, contract, tort, trust, and public-law interfaces, making routing observable without semantic alignment.
A single anchor role—an owner–manager acting as both shareholder and managerial decision-maker—is used as a tracing unit.
This unit carries one continuous event-flow across tax, contract, tort, trust, and public-law interfaces, making routing observable without semantic alignment.
IRF adopts a minimal structural constraint derived from the Cabinet–Drawer Model (CDM):
F^GC = X × Y
X: cross-interface continuity
Y: admissibility across stages
Routing remains operative only when both dimensions are non-zero.
Routing Grammar: Flow → Interface₁ → Interface₂ → … → Output
Interface Table: structured recording of transformations
Mismatch / Distortion Flags
State Readout (operative / blocked / unstable)