Embedded Files
In rule-dense institutional environments, the problem is rarely a lack of policy, data, or intent.
More often, the difficulty lies in the fact that structural processes are not directly visible.
Rules are triggered, resources move, eligibility is verified, and outcomes accumulate —
but these processes are typically dispersed across documents, departments, and professional languages.
As a result, friction within the system is felt, discussed, and debated, yet remains difficult to describe with precision.
Fiscal Geometry does not introduce new opinions.
It provides a way to make institutional structure observable.
In many institutional settings, this is how the system is first encountered:
information exists, processes are active, yet the overall structure is difficult to follow.
What feels like confusion is often the result of overlapping rules, repeated triggers, and intersecting paths —
not a lack of data or effort.
This image reflects that starting condition, before any structure is imposed.
Using the same underlying data, a data-driven mapping process reorganizes overlapping records into traceable paths.
Nothing is added or interpreted — the difference lies in structure, not judgment.
What initially appears tangled becomes legible once the data is arranged relationally rather than narratively.
This image illustrates that shift: from accumulation to structure, using the same inputs.
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse